top of page

Why Our "Inclusive" Language Often Falls Short

We’ve all seen them: the window decals, the email signatures, and the social media bios claiming to be "fully inclusive" or "LGBTQ+ friendly." On the surface, these feel like warm signals of safety. But for many in the community, these phrases have started to feel a bit... thin.


When we use "safe" language, we often accidentally prioritise our own comfort over the actual visibility of the people we’re trying to support. Let’s break down why some of our favourite go-to phrases might be missing the mark, and how we can swap them for inclusive language that actually shows active allyship.


When "Nice" Isn't Enough to be truly inclusive

1. "Love is Love"

This was the rallying cry for marriage equality, and while it served a purpose, it has a significant blind spot.

  • The Intent: To show that all romantic relationships are valid.

  • The Impact: It centres the conversation entirely on who we love, while completely ignoring who we are. This phrase does nothing for the Trans, Non-binary, or Asexual communities. It suggests that the only way to be "valid" is to be in a palatable, romantic relationship.

  • How it feels: It feels like "Queer-Lite" - it accepts the parts of us that look like traditional couples but ignores our unique identities and struggles.

Rainbow mural with "LOVE IS LOVE" text on a tiled wall. Small text reads "WE LIKE YOU TOO." Vines and lights above frame.

2. "LGBTQ+ Friendly"

  • The Intent: To say "You are welcome here."

  • The Impact: "Friendly" is a passive state of being. It’s the bare minimum. You can be "dog-friendly" or "budget-friendly," but human rights require more than just a lack of hostility.

  • How it feels: Conditional. It suggests we are guests in your space rather than equal participants.


3. "I’m Fully Inclusive"

  • The Intent: To signal that you have no biases.

  • The Impact: It acts as a "Mission Accomplished" banner. It shuts down the conversation. Real inclusion is a continuous, often messy process of learning and unlearning.

  • How it feels: Dismissive of intersectionality. It assumes a "one size fits all" approach that rarely works for the most marginalised members of our community.

Moving Toward Active Allyship & what actually inclusive language looks like

If we want to move from being "safe" to being "supportive," we need to use language that is active, specific, and affirming.

Old Phrase

The Upgrade

Why it works

"Love is Love"

"I celebrate all identities and orientations."

It acknowledges gender identity, not just romantic love.

"LGBTQ+ Friendly"

"LGBTQ+ Affirming"

"Affirming" means you actively validate and support who a person is.

"Fully Inclusive"

"Committed to ongoing inclusion and equity."

It admits that inclusion is a work in progress, not a destination.

"I accept everyone"

"I stand in solidarity with the Trans and Queer community."

It names the community specifically, which is a powerful act of visibility.


How to Be an Active Ally (The "Doing" Part)

Language is a start, but allyship is a verb. Here are three ways to back up your new, affirming language:

  1. Specify Your Support: Don't be afraid to use the words. Say "Trans rights." Say "Non-binary visibility." Using specific language shows you aren't afraid of the "controversial" parts of our community.

  2. State Your "Why": Instead of a generic sticker, state your policy. "We do not tolerate deadnaming or misgendering in this space" is much more powerful than "We are inclusive."

  3. Invite Correction: A true ally says, "I am committed to being affirming. If I ever miss the mark or use the wrong terminology, please call me in so I can do better."


Being LGBTQ+ Affirming means more than just opening the door; it means making sure the room is built for everyone to thrive once they walk through it. It’s about moving from "I don't mind" to "I'm glad you're here, and I've got your back."

Comments


bottom of page